<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular price comparison sites &#8211; July 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probargainhunter.com/2007/08/12/popular-price-comparison-sites-july-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2007/08/12/popular-price-comparison-sites-july-2007/</link>
	<description>News, Tips and Resources for Online Bargain Hunters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 02:23:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yan</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2007/08/12/popular-price-comparison-sites-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-27694</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/2007/08/12/popular-price-comparison-sites-july-2007/#comment-27694</guid>
		<description>The discussion for this blog post is closed. To leave your comments please go to the latest revision of the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The discussion for this blog post is closed. To leave your comments please go to the latest revision of the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yan</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2007/08/12/popular-price-comparison-sites-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-27374</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/2007/08/12/popular-price-comparison-sites-july-2007/#comment-27374</guid>
		<description>It would be real hard if impossible to obtain any financial data including conversions (clicks through to merchants). These are not public companies (for the most part). 

As for the traffic, I have done &lt;a href=&quot;http://probargainhunter.com/2007/04/17/comparing-finance-blogs-is-alexa-worthless/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some research in the past&lt;/a&gt; and when comparing apples to apples (sites within the same category) Alexa is a very good indication of how well a site is doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be real hard if impossible to obtain any financial data including conversions (clicks through to merchants). These are not public companies (for the most part). </p>
<p>As for the traffic, I have done <a href="http://probargainhunter.com/2007/04/17/comparing-finance-blogs-is-alexa-worthless/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">some research in the past</a> and when comparing apples to apples (sites within the same category) Alexa is a very good indication of how well a site is doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheif Torkem</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2007/08/12/popular-price-comparison-sites-july-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-27363</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheif Torkem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/2007/08/12/popular-price-comparison-sites-july-2007/#comment-27363</guid>
		<description>Any insights into sales generated by these sights? Be interesting to rank them by 1)sales generated to merchants listed on their sites, 2)clicks to the merchants listed on their sites, and 3)amount of REAL traffic (i.e. organic traffic as opposed to paid traffic from Google and the like, which can be inflated to make a site look big without saying anything about the real health of the company).

Thoughts?

Torkem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any insights into sales generated by these sights? Be interesting to rank them by 1)sales generated to merchants listed on their sites, 2)clicks to the merchants listed on their sites, and 3)amount of REAL traffic (i.e. organic traffic as opposed to paid traffic from Google and the like, which can be inflated to make a site look big without saying anything about the real health of the company).</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>Torkem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

