<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why coupon site owners hate RetailMeNot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/</link>
	<description>News, Tips and Resources for Online Bargain Hunters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 02:23:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: couponboa</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-68776</link>
		<dc:creator>couponboa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-68776</guid>
		<description>Being the owner of a coupon website (1/1000th RMN - both traffic &amp; conversions),  I know they have done an incredible work! Each day, thousands of real shoppers express their thanks to RetailMeNot for being helpful. Is that all bullshit? 

To my belief, nothing is exclusive and nothing is confidential - coupon codes are no different. RMN helps people to find a coupon, which would be otherwise hidden under the custody of few affiliate websites. If a consumer is able to save money, that&#039;s what we should aim at. Since, nobody can ever get closer to RetailMeNot, let&#039;s accept the reality. And say thanks to RetailMeNot.

Why take the battle to this far end?

Let&#039;s pave our path peacefully admitting the fact that RetailMeNot will still be the ruler in coupon field, like Google stays far far away in search engineering.

Happy to help,
couponboaboa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being the owner of a coupon website (1/1000th RMN &#8211; both traffic &amp; conversions),  I know they have done an incredible work! Each day, thousands of real shoppers express their thanks to RetailMeNot for being helpful. Is that all bullshit? </p>
<p>To my belief, nothing is exclusive and nothing is confidential &#8211; coupon codes are no different. RMN helps people to find a coupon, which would be otherwise hidden under the custody of few affiliate websites. If a consumer is able to save money, that&#8217;s what we should aim at. Since, nobody can ever get closer to RetailMeNot, let&#8217;s accept the reality. And say thanks to RetailMeNot.</p>
<p>Why take the battle to this far end?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s pave our path peacefully admitting the fact that RetailMeNot will still be the ruler in coupon field, like Google stays far far away in search engineering.</p>
<p>Happy to help,<br />
couponboaboa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65702</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65702</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why not accept that coupons will be spread and make exclusive coupons ACTUALLY exclusive. i.e. if anybody uses that coupon, then the associated affiliate gets the commission regardless of click through?&quot;

At this point it really does seem to be the best solution.  I really do sympathize: for years my retail site was the tops (or near the top) in Google for several brands I carry - then a new  &quot;shopping engine&quot; comes along and is dominating Google for hundreds of brands.  Now of course I would mind regardless but the fact of the matter is there are other sites that are a heck of a lot more helpful than this site that has incomplete feeds GALORE.  But the bottom line is: I work my butt off on my retail site and by manually managing my affiliate sites and some big-a$$ company comes along with high priced programmers and knock me down the page and I&#039;m sure the same has happened to hordes of smaller coupon sites.

From my recollection 9 times out of 10 when I search for a coupon for some site or other RMN comes up first in Google.

seoscoop recently posted about the massive difference between appearing 1st in the SERPS and 2nd or 3rd (I&#039;m sorry I can&#039;t find the link right now)so darn right there is resentment out there.  The number one rule in affiliate marketing is: DIFFERENTIATE yourself - offer something that other sites don&#039;t and I fully sympathize with those smaller coupon sites who have cultivated relationships in the hopes of being able to &quot;offer something different&quot; only to have their exclusive co-opted by another company and if that weren&#039;t bad enough for RMN to advertise the code as THEIR EXCLUSIVE just adds insult to injury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why not accept that coupons will be spread and make exclusive coupons ACTUALLY exclusive. i.e. if anybody uses that coupon, then the associated affiliate gets the commission regardless of click through?&#8221;</p>
<p>At this point it really does seem to be the best solution.  I really do sympathize: for years my retail site was the tops (or near the top) in Google for several brands I carry &#8211; then a new  &#8220;shopping engine&#8221; comes along and is dominating Google for hundreds of brands.  Now of course I would mind regardless but the fact of the matter is there are other sites that are a heck of a lot more helpful than this site that has incomplete feeds GALORE.  But the bottom line is: I work my butt off on my retail site and by manually managing my affiliate sites and some big-a$$ company comes along with high priced programmers and knock me down the page and I&#8217;m sure the same has happened to hordes of smaller coupon sites.</p>
<p>From my recollection 9 times out of 10 when I search for a coupon for some site or other RMN comes up first in Google.</p>
<p>seoscoop recently posted about the massive difference between appearing 1st in the SERPS and 2nd or 3rd (I&#8217;m sorry I can&#8217;t find the link right now)so darn right there is resentment out there.  The number one rule in affiliate marketing is: DIFFERENTIATE yourself &#8211; offer something that other sites don&#8217;t and I fully sympathize with those smaller coupon sites who have cultivated relationships in the hopes of being able to &#8220;offer something different&#8221; only to have their exclusive co-opted by another company and if that weren&#8217;t bad enough for RMN to advertise the code as THEIR EXCLUSIVE just adds insult to injury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matrimony</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65697</link>
		<dc:creator>Matrimony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65697</guid>
		<description>Ethics and playing fair means nothing to these type of people. It&#039;s all about the money and in the end I believe they&#039;ll get what they deserve...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethics and playing fair means nothing to these type of people. It&#8217;s all about the money and in the end I believe they&#8217;ll get what they deserve&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piotr</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65654</link>
		<dc:creator>Piotr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65654</guid>
		<description>Hello Yan ! Thanks for this interresting article. If you ask me to rewrite your conclusion, I&#039;ll just add the tagline of a UK deals website (HotUKDeals) and explain the &quot;new breed&quot; with theirs own words :

&quot;
We think HUKD disrupts traditional marketing messages and offers a disruptive network where individuals have the freedom to recommend genuine bargains and deals to other individuals. 
&quot;

Thanks and have a nice day.

Regards,

Piotr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Yan ! Thanks for this interresting article. If you ask me to rewrite your conclusion, I&#8217;ll just add the tagline of a UK deals website (HotUKDeals) and explain the &#8220;new breed&#8221; with theirs own words :</p>
<p>&#8220;<br />
We think HUKD disrupts traditional marketing messages and offers a disruptive network where individuals have the freedom to recommend genuine bargains and deals to other individuals.<br />
&#8220;</p>
<p>Thanks and have a nice day.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Piotr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark B.</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65648</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65648</guid>
		<description>No it is not stealing.  It is a way to deal with the realities of the web for people who whinge about the realities of the web.

If you want to pander to affiliates, you make popular websites more profitable.  If you want to pander to affiliate managers who want control over the content they are providing, you do it the way I suggested.

If you want the best of both worlds, you allow both side by side, and let the best deal win, and let affiliate managers decide for themselves, without creating vitriol because you personally feel wronged by someone elses success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it is not stealing.  It is a way to deal with the realities of the web for people who whinge about the realities of the web.</p>
<p>If you want to pander to affiliates, you make popular websites more profitable.  If you want to pander to affiliate managers who want control over the content they are providing, you do it the way I suggested.</p>
<p>If you want the best of both worlds, you allow both side by side, and let the best deal win, and let affiliate managers decide for themselves, without creating vitriol because you personally feel wronged by someone elses success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Y.</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65647</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65647</guid>
		<description>I think exclusive coupon that ultimately credits whom the coupon is issued to can be a good idea. However from that forum thread, it seems it&#039;s more of a technical issue (although should be relatively trivial to resolve).

HOWEVER, although some affiliates have worked hard with the aff network and merchants to get the exclusive deal, I have to say others have also worked hard (and might have spent a lot) to get the traffic, where someone else&#039;s exclusive coupons get used and commission went elsewhere. Profiting from the traffic that someone else has worked or paid for -- is that stealing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think exclusive coupon that ultimately credits whom the coupon is issued to can be a good idea. However from that forum thread, it seems it&#8217;s more of a technical issue (although should be relatively trivial to resolve).</p>
<p>HOWEVER, although some affiliates have worked hard with the aff network and merchants to get the exclusive deal, I have to say others have also worked hard (and might have spent a lot) to get the traffic, where someone else&#8217;s exclusive coupons get used and commission went elsewhere. Profiting from the traffic that someone else has worked or paid for &#8212; is that stealing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark B.</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65641</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65641</guid>
		<description>Why not accept that coupons will be spread and make exclusive coupons ACTUALLY exclusive.  i.e. if anybody uses that coupon, then the associated affiliate gets the commission regardless of click through?

This could discourage other affiliates from promoting those codes and make them work harder for exclusives. (that seems to be the major gripe, hard workers are getting less money than people with more intelligent algorithms).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not accept that coupons will be spread and make exclusive coupons ACTUALLY exclusive.  i.e. if anybody uses that coupon, then the associated affiliate gets the commission regardless of click through?</p>
<p>This could discourage other affiliates from promoting those codes and make them work harder for exclusives. (that seems to be the major gripe, hard workers are getting less money than people with more intelligent algorithms).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike g.</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65639</link>
		<dc:creator>mike g.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65639</guid>
		<description>OK, so if it is ethically wrong and you can&#039;t stop sharing on the internet, what can we do? 

If you look at what the music industry has tried to do with piracy, and how they failed, it doesn&#039;t look promising. 

I know someone on Abest mentioned this, but why not just embed coupons in links? Seems like a pretty good idea for the time being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so if it is ethically wrong and you can&#8217;t stop sharing on the internet, what can we do? </p>
<p>If you look at what the music industry has tried to do with piracy, and how they failed, it doesn&#8217;t look promising. </p>
<p>I know someone on Abest mentioned this, but why not just embed coupons in links? Seems like a pretty good idea for the time being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Y.</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65632</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65632</guid>
		<description>Well. Looks like Australia is really the land of the convicted -- RetailMeNot (Melbourne) was accused of stealing exclusive coupons, and a few threads above in the same forum, Tjoos (Sydney) was also accused of the same thing...

Yan -- I think you are running ProBargainHunter from a consumers&#039;, or a &quot;bargain hunter&#039;s&quot; point of view and I fully agree with what you are saying here. After all coupons are there to be shared, and I think most merchants won&#039;t care as long as sales are made. Most whiners there are probably just kicking themselves thinking &quot;hey how come I didn&#039;t think of the UGC idea first&quot;.

I am running a social bargain site in Australia, and have quite a few &quot;exclusive&quot; coupons (which I earn no affiliation commission for). I am pretty sure many ended up on sites like RMN and Tjoos. Well. More power to them to spread the good bargains around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. Looks like Australia is really the land of the convicted &#8212; RetailMeNot (Melbourne) was accused of stealing exclusive coupons, and a few threads above in the same forum, Tjoos (Sydney) was also accused of the same thing&#8230;</p>
<p>Yan &#8212; I think you are running ProBargainHunter from a consumers&#8217;, or a &#8220;bargain hunter&#8217;s&#8221; point of view and I fully agree with what you are saying here. After all coupons are there to be shared, and I think most merchants won&#8217;t care as long as sales are made. Most whiners there are probably just kicking themselves thinking &#8220;hey how come I didn&#8217;t think of the UGC idea first&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am running a social bargain site in Australia, and have quite a few &#8220;exclusive&#8221; coupons (which I earn no affiliation commission for). I am pretty sure many ended up on sites like RMN and Tjoos. Well. More power to them to spread the good bargains around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yan</title>
		<link>http://probargainhunter.com/2009/09/25/why-coupon-site-owners-hate-retailmenot/comment-page-1/#comment-65621</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probargainhunter.com/?p=2962#comment-65621</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;First you delete my thread and the others but when you see the resulting traffic you decide to turn it all back on … ummm what’s the word??? OPPORTUNISTIC!&#8221;</p>
<p>Your comment and the following two were automatically held for moderation (as any first time comments on this blog are held to avoid spam). Stop attacking me with no ground whatsoever. </p>
<p>A lot of things in this world hold potentiality of money. This comment of yours on my blog for example may end up in search for your name and I will make money off of it with the Google ads on the sidebar. Did I just steal your name from you?</p>
<p>As to your belief that there are no &#8220;new realities&#8221;, check the news around AACS encryption key controversy</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.....ontroversy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

